VAR decisions have become a familiar topic in recent Manchester City matches. From Antoine Semenyo’s disallowed goal against Newcastle, to Diogo Dalot not being sent off for a dangerous challenge on Jeremy Doku in City’s 2-nil Manchester derby defeat, to City not being awarded a penalty against Wolves for handball, through to Dominic Solanke being awarded a goal that came off Marc Guehi after Solanke kicked through the back of Guehi’s legs last weekend in City’s 2-all draw with Tottenham, VAR has played a role in Manchester City’s matches.
VAR once again played a role in Manchester City’s 2-1 win over Liverpool at Anfield yesterday. This time, VAR got the decision right by the letter of law. But seriously the entire situation that unfolded was absurd and it highlighted everything wrong with VAR currently.
A special moment for Manchester City was taken away by VAR at Anfield.
Late in yesterday’s match at Anfield, Liverpool were pushing men forward to try and find a late equalizer. Arne Slot’s side pushed their keeper Alisson upfield in a desperate attempt to find a late goal. By doing this, Liverpool left the opportunity for City to score a third goal into an empty net wide open. In the 101st minute of yesterday’s match, that is exactly what happened.
A high ball in midfield was won by Bernardo Silva. The Manchester City captain flicked the ball to Rayan Cherki. With Alisson stranded behind him, Cherki knew that the Liverpool goal was unguarded. The French international hit a dribbling strike that slowly rolled towards the goal. Cherki’s strike wasn’t powerful, to say the least. The ball was meandering its way into the net. As the ball rolled towards the net, Erling Haaland took off like a freight train in an attempt to tap the ball into an empty net. All that was in Haaland’s way was make shift Liverpool right-back Dominik Szoboszlai. As Haaland went to sprint past Szoboszlai, the Hungarian international pulled Haaland back. In response, Haaland pulled Szoboszlai back as the ball rolled into the net. Referee Craig Pawson awarded a goal and the Manchester City fans, staff and players celebrated jubilantly.

Then the absurdity of VAR hit, and the scenes that followed were laughable for how absurd they were.
But the Manchester City celebrations were cut short. VAR intervened. Referee Craig Pawson was called over to the monitor. This is when the absolute absurd nature of VAR struck. Trying to describe all of this isn’t simple, as the events were barely believable, but the entire situation was laughable.
First, we had Liverpool players protesting that Cherki’s goal shouldn’t stand due to Szoboszlai having being fouled by Erling Haaland. Those protests ignored the fact that Szoboszlai had fouled Haaland moments before Haaland fouled Liverpool’s goal scorer. Once Craig Pawson was called to the monitor there was only one outcome coming to the situation. Rayan Cherki’s goal would be ruled out, and Dominik Szoboszlai would be sent off. There was no reality that exists where Szoboslai stayed on the pitch after denying Haaland a clear goal scoring opportunity and Cherki’s goal was disallowed with no action taken against Szoboszlai for his foul on Haaland. Perhaps in the emotion of it all the Liverpool players forgot this.

Then, we had a situation where the Manchester City players and staff were arguing against their opponents having a player sent off. Has that ever happened before? I can’t think of that situation ever occurring. City wanted the goal to stand, understandably so. Liverpool likely didn’t want Szoboszlai sent off, who will now have a three-game ban to contend with. While the decision that VAR reached is correct by the letter of the law, is that what we want VAR used for? A special moment was taken away, and in one instance, the absurd nature of VAR stood out for the world to see. The scenes that followed would never have happened in football until VAR arrived. Added to the mix was that Craig Pawson’s explanation could barely be heard. If any one particular moment highlights how ridiculous VAR has become, it occurred last night at Anfield.
🤦♂️ “It was madness… it’s insanity!”
😡 “It made a laughing stock of the game! Pathetic decision!”
Stelling and McCoist hammer the decision to rule out #MCFC‘s third goal vs #LFC and send off Szoboszlai! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/9a0yxWV930
— talkSPORT (@talkSPORT) February 9, 2026
VAR needs to be refined before it cause any more damage to the game.
First of all, I’ll say I don’t believe there is a conspiracy against Manchester City in terms of VAR or anything else. I’m not going to go into that topic. But I do believe that VAR isn’t fit for purpose. It is now re-refereeing matches to the point that is ridiculous. Striving for perfection in terms of refereeing decisions goes against the very nature of the game. Football happens in real time, and referees make decisions in real time in an instant. They do not get the benefit of a replay, nor do the players. We now have referees in a room at Stockley Park forensically dissecting every moment of a match. The elation of celebrating goals is fading, as the first instinct is now to pause to see what the referee will do. It’s frankly absurd.
VAR isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. The genie is out of the bottle in that regard. But it does need to be refined. Common sense needs to prevail in some instances, like last night’s, for example. Rayan Cherki’s goal should have stood, and we all move on. Also, the match-attending fans need to be better informed of what VAR is investigating rather than a token message on a screen. Another possibility to consider is that a time limit must be introduced to stop VAR from halting the momentum of a match. But all of that is a topic of discussion for another day.
Final thoughts.
In the end, the absurd and ridiculous nature of VAR stood out like a sore thumb at Anfield yesterday. Manchester City and Rayan Cherki were robbed of a spectacular moment by a system determined to find perfection in an imperfect game. Perhaps that is the entire issue with VAR. Who knows at this point but you do sense that scenes like the ones we witnessed last night will happen more often.




Whether the final decision matters not as it was a case of VAR re refereeing the game. The Ref.had seen everything that happened and gave the goal. VAR offered him no new details but ordered him to obey the rules to the letter. No one would have complained if the goal had stood and no red card. “Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men”
I am a blue. You can’t criticise VAR for getting it right! Everyone complains about the mistakes it does make but when it’s correct it it’s wrong for spoiling the game. What!!!! Come on think about it guys.
Ah so basically a player gets sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity and the goal gets scored! Now VAR actually stops the goal so perhaps it is time to red card VAR.I wonder if you would be so “sang froid” had the scores been level at the time?
Bless you, Gary, for being the voice of reason here.
You’re right, the call was the right one in regards to the letter of the law, it was how it all unfolded that I found amusing. It is what it is.
The ultimate irony of VAR, after watching the incident several times that led to Szoboszlai’s stunning free kick was there was no foul there to be called that led to Liverpool’s goal. Yet we’re meant to accept that and move on. It’s just a strange situation all around with VAR now. I know they cannot check that incident that led to Szoboszlai’s goal but to go through the process for Cherki’s disallowed goal and that particular incident is glossed over says it all really.
The best analogy of VAR as yet. Do you think one day they will have a VAR to check VAR?
The powers that be seem to have forgotten that Professional Football is actually an entertainment and the paying public are not entertained by this nonsense. Imagine if a concert with the Halle kept being interrupted by someone wanting to check if the bassoonist had played the right note?
Always mcfc games! Funny that
When you bring up 1) the Rashford offside in 2023 (2) Cup Final Henderson not red card (3) Semenyo at Newcastle (4) Cherki goal
(5) Wolves handball and I am sure you can think of many others BUT what about disallowing the Aguero goal and taking away the title. Surely after 14 years VAR could have found something by now
The only absurdity here is that so many are demanding that the rules of the sport are NOT followed when official’s decisions are reviewed by VAR. I’m frankly disgusted by the blinkered and biased mentality of those criticizing the decision, and that goes for City, Loserpool and Arsen supporters.
“Disgusted?” A bit strong? The point being made is: “Is the purpose of VAR to re referee games?” You obviously think so but will find the vast number of supporters and media punters would not agree. The Ref was clearly unhappy and merely had to judge that Haaland had not fouled Soba. so, the goal could stand and everyone (apart from you) happy. Oh, how they all praised the Ref.at the Wolves match who did not change his handball/penalty decision.